Cases 31 - 40 of 67
Raphael Mendez v. Counselor Rosemark, et al
as 14-2951
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Raphael Mendez
Defendant - Appellee:
Counselor Rosemark, Case Manager Cosette and Other Unknown Members at FMC Rochester, Minnesota, et al.
Mendez v. Courter
as 4:2014cv00269
Plaintiff:
Felipe Mendez, Jr
Defendant:
John Courter, Daniel Davis, Mark Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendez v. Rosemark et al.
as 0:2014cv00402
Plaintiff:
Raphael Mendez
Defendant:
Rosemark, Ms. Cosette and and Other UNKNOWN members at FMC Rochester, Minnesota et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wycoff et al v. Ludwick et al
as 4:2013cv00448
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray Wycoff
Defendant:
Nick Ludwick, Debbie Nichol, Mark Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ivan Mendez v. United States, et al
as 12-3532
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ivan Mendez
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, One of the Conected Wired Members, of a Big International Criminal Organization, The Conected Wired Member and others
Raphael Mendez v. Warden B. Jett, et al
as 12-3174
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Raphael Mendez
Defendant - Appellee:
Warden B. R. Jett and FMC Legal Mail Room
Mendez v. Jett et al
as 0:2012cv01128
Plaintiff:
Raphael Mendez
Defendant:
B. R. Jett and FMC Legal Mail Room
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ivan Mendez v. Connected Wire Member
as 12-1946
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ivan Mendez
Defendant - Appellee:
Connected Wire Members of a big international criminal organization
Mendez v. Connected Wired Members of a Big International Criminal Organization
as 4:2012cv00127
Plaintiff:
Ivan Mendez
Defendant:
Connected Wired Members
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendez v. The United States of America et al
as 4:2012cv03055
Defendant:
Conected, Wired soldiers, One of the Conected Wired Members, The Conected Wired Member and others
Plaintiff:
Ivan L. Mendez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
