Cases 41 - 50 of 86
Daulton v. Dooley et al
as 4:2014cv04123
Plaintiff:
Johnathan L. Daulton
Defendant:
Robert Dooley, Chad Rotert and Crystal Van Vorren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dale v. Dejong et al
as 4:2014cv04102
Plaintiff:
James Irving Dale
Defendant:
Kelly Tjeerdsma, Michael Meyer, Rebecca Schiefer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Siers v. Young et al
as 4:2014cv04087
Plaintiff:
Donovan Craig Siers
Defendant:
Darin Young, Robert Dooley, Patrick MaGorian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Kaemingk et al
as 4:2014cv04068
Plaintiff:
Leslie John Johnson
Defendant:
Denny Kaemingk, Robert Dooley, Rebecca Schieffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heiser v. Dooley et al
as 4:2014cv04050
Plaintiff:
Kenny Lee Heiser
Defendant:
Robert Dooley, Randy Stevens, Andi Gates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dale v. Dooley et al
as 4:2014cv04003
Plaintiff:
James I. Dale
Defendant:
Robert Dooley, Jennifer Wagner, George Deglman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scheetz v. Kaemingk et al
as 4:2013cv04144
Plaintiff:
Daryl Scheetz
Defendant:
Dennis Kaemingk, Robert Dooley, Darren Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel R. Dalrymple, et al v. Robert Dooley, et al
as 13-1204
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Daniel R. Dalrymple and Leslie W. White, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Robert Dooley, Warden, Mike Durfee State Prison, SCO Jackson, Correctional Officer, Sgt. Dykstra, Correctional Officer and others
Briley v. Dooley et al
as 4:2012cv04210
Plaintiff:
Liberty Cash Briley
Defendant:
Robert Dooley, Major Tjerdsma, Tammy Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freidel v. Kaemingk et al
as 4:2012cv04203
Plaintiff:
Donald Edward Freidel
Defendant:
Dennis Kaemingk, Robert Dooley and South Dakota Dept. of Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
