Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Trice v. Unknown et al
as 1:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Raymond J. Trice
Defendant:
Unknown, Chad Nixon, Matt Greer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Libertus v. Harris et al
as 4:2022cv01226
Plaintiff:
Timothy Libertus
Defendant:
Peyton Keener Harris, Michael Thompson, Taylor Bort and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Long v. Turner et al
as 4:2021cv00242
Defendant:
Johnston, Murphy, Wolfe and others
Plaintiff:
Rashawn L Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Betts v. Jackson County Missouri et al
as 4:2021cv00023
Defendant:
Jackson County Missouri, Corrections Officer Linton Mckenzie, Captain Tony Bowers and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Eugene Betts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaertner v. Sowell et al
as 4:2020cv01872
Defendant:
Sharron Williams, 2nd, Madison Hudson, Chase Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Gaertner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Adams et al
as 4:2020cv00402
Defendant:
T Figus, Nfor, L Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Derius Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
West v. Bowers et al
as 1:2019cv00093
Defendant:
Unknown Bowers, Debbie Unknown, Shane Duncan and others
Plaintiff:
Mitchell West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowers v. Mullen et al
as 4:2014cv01185
Plaintiff:
Mark Bowers
Defendant:
David A. Mullen, John Williams, Corizon Mo Regional Office, Medical Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowers v. St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 4:2010cv00006
Plaintiff:
William Martin Bowers
Defendant:
St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department, Unknown Johnson, Unknown Boyce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leslie v. City of Raytown et al
as 4:2009cv00847
Plaintiff:
Mae Elizabeth Leslie
Defendant:
City of Raytown, David Bower, Jim Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
