Long v. Turner et al
| Rashawn L Long |
| Johnston, Murphy, Wolfe, Mikrett, Diana Turner, Wallace, White, Watson, Cunningham, Greg, Grayson, Oz, N Serano, Arroya, Duvall, Rachell Draper, Darryl Forte, Jane Doe, Obiesie, Cloonan, Bowers, Darryl Unknown, Shogu, Osaikuwuomwan, Copes, Otto, Jaidah and Akanuligo |
| 4:2021cv00242 |
| April 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Fernando J Gaitan |
| Prisoner Pro Se |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER: ORDERED that, Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to submit payment of $402 and his amended complaint (Doc. 11), is granted. Plaintiff is reminded, if he does not choose to proceed in forma pauperis, he must submit $402 for filing and administrative expenses. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this Order on or before July 26, 2021, will result in dismissal of this case without further notice to Plaintiff. Signed on 5/26/2021 by District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. (Willis, Kathy)
|
| Filing 11 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION for extension of time or stay filed by Rashawn L Long. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 6/9/2021. (Willis, Kathy) |
|
Filing 10
ORDERED that, Plaintiff's motion, which the Court interprets as a request for an extension of time to submit payment of $402 and his amended complaint (Doc. #9 ), is granted. Plaintiff is reminded, if he does not choose to proceed in forma pauperis, he must submit $402 for filing and administrative expenses. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this Order on or before June 24, 2021, will result in dismissal of this case without further notice to Plaintiff. The Clerk of the Court is further directed to send Plaintiff a copy of the Court's May 6, 2021 Order (Doc. 7).Signed on 5/24/2021 by District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (CLERK'S NOTE: A copy of the Order dated 5/6/2024 (Doc. 7) along with this TEXT ORDER sent to Plaintiff as directed.)(Willis, Kathy)
|
| Filing 9 PLAINTIFF'S 2ND MOTION for extension of time to pay filing fee filed by Rashawn L Long. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 6/7/2021. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 8 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Rashawn L Long. (Willis, Kathy) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to pay the filing fee (Doc. #6 ), is granted; (2) Plaintiff must either submit $402 to the Clerk of the Court or submit a request to proceed in forma pauperis and an affidavit in support thereof; (3) the Clerk of the Court is directed to send Plaintiff another set of civil rights forms for his use in filing an amended complaint; (4) Plaintiff is directed to file a single superseding amended complaint, as specifically discussed herein; (5) Plaintiff is advised of his obligation to have Defendants timely served under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 if he submits the full $402 fee; and (6) Plaintiff's failure to either submit $402 to the Clerk of the Court or submit a request to proceed in forma pauperis and an affidavit in support thereof and submit a superseding amended complaint as discussed herein, on or before June 10, 2021, will result in the dismissal of this case without further notice. Signed on May 6, 2021 by District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. (CLERK'S NOTE: Civil rights and in forma pauperis forms mailed to plaintiff with copy of order as directed.) (Davies, Cindy)
|
| Filing 6 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION for extension of time to pay filing fee filed by Rashawn L Long. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/19/2021.(Willis, Kathy) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER that, because Plaintiff has neither paid to the Clerk of the Court the $350 filing fee, nor has submitted a request to proceed in forma pauperis and an affidavit of poverty in support thereof as directed in this Court's April 13, 2021 Order (Doc. #3 ), Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE, on or before May 14, 2021, as to why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) due to Plaintiff's failure to comply with this Court's Orders. Plaintiff's failure to file a timely response will result in dismissal of this case without further notice. Signed on April 29, 2021 by District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Davies, Cindy)
|
| Filing 4 Inmate ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by Rashawn L Long. (Davies, Cindy) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) plaintiff is granted provisional leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a); (2) plaintiff is directed to correct the above-listed technical defects in this complaint on or before April 27, 2021; (3) the Clerk of the Court is directed to mail plaintiff a copy of this Order along with in forma pauperis forms; and (4) FAILURE OF PLAINTIFF TO COMPLY WITH THIS COURT'S ORDER WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF. Signed on April 13, 2021 by District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. (CLERK'S NOTE: In forma pauperis forms mailed to plaintiff with copy of order as directed.) (Davies, Cindy)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Rashawn L Long. (Attachment: #1 Exhibits)(Davies, Cindy)(CLERK'S NOTE: All exhibits are copies of documents, some are partially illegible and were not able to be copied darker.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
