Cases 1 - 10 of 1,734
Duvall v. RYDER TRUCK RENTAL, INC.
as 2:2024cv01920
Plaintiff:
James Duvall
Defendant:
RYDER TRUCK RENTAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Crosby v. Warden, Duval County Jail
as 8:2024cv01011
Petitioner:
James B.V. Crosby
Respondent:
Warden, Duval County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY a/s/o TODD DUVALL v. CLARK
as 2:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, TODD DUVALL and RICHARD CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Williams v. Ritchey et al
as 3:2024cv00367
Plaintiff:
Willie Williams
Defendant:
Charles David Ritchey, W. J. Mooneyham, J. R. Starling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Duval County School District v. Alphabet Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Duval County School District
Defendant:
Alphabet Inc., ByteDance, Inc., ByteDance Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Cardwell v. Roundtree et al
as 1:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Duval F. Cardwell
Defendant:
Sheriff Richard Roundtree, Major Mitchell, Major Rawlings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Folsom et al
as 1:2024cv01405
Plaintiff:
Lionesha-Diana Smith
Defendant:
D. Bradley Folsom, Clarke, Moore, DuVall & Rodgers and Renasant Bank
Cause Of Action: 28:l332 Diversity - Foreclosure
DUVALL v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00583
Plaintiff:
TAMI LAINE DUVALL
Defendant:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DUVALL v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00100
Petitioner:
TAMI LAINE DUVALL
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DUVALL v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00101
Petitioner:
TAMI LAINE DUVALL
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
