Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Dusty Cox v. Mark Pearson, et al
as 16-4307
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dusty James Cox
Defendant - Appellee:
Mark Pearson, Dr., Harrell Watts, National Inmate Appeals Administrator, A. W. Medina, Associate Warden of Health Services and others
Phillip Stewart v. Wendy Kelley, et al
as 16-2165
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Phillip Dewayne Stewart
Defendant - Appellee:
Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction and Raymond Naylor, Disciplinary Appeal Administrator, Arkansas Department of Correction
Neill v. Beetem et al
as 2:2014cv04169
Plaintiff:
Krisda J. Neill
Defendant:
Jon E Beetem, Thomas Chapman, Jeremiah Nixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Timothy Wise v. Hipolito Matos, et al
as 13-2346
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Timothy S. Wise
Defendant:
Harley G. Lappin, Director, Bureau of Prisons, T. C. Outlaw, Warden, FCI - Forrest City, Daryl Maune, Captain, FCI - Forrest City and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Hipolito Matos, Clinical Director, FCI - Forrest City; Dr., Originally Sued As Matos and Rufo Refendor, Mid-Level Practitioner, FCI - Forrest City, Originally Sued As Refender
Dimitrios Manolatos v. Jill Dube-Gilley, et al
as 13-1359
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dimitrios Manolatos
Defendant - Appellee:
Jill Dube-Gilley, Unit Manager, FCI - Forrest City, T. C. Outlaw, Warden, FCI - Forrest City, G. Maldonado, Regional Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Ramon McGraw v. Berry Sims, et al
as 11-2859
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ramon Hosea McGraw
Defendant - Appellee:
Berry Sims, Pulaski County Circuit Judge, Kent Krouse, Public Defender, Gary Arnold, Saline County Circuit Judge and others
Timothy Wise v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 11-2414
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Timothy S. Wise
Defendant - Appellee:
Harley G. Lappin, Director, Bureau of Prisons, T. C. Outlaw, Warden, FCI - Forrest City, Daryl Maune, Captain, FCI - Forrest City and others
Defendant:
Angie Roach, Dentist, FCI - Forrest City
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
