Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Merritt v. Benton et al
as 5:2023cv06037
Plaintiff:
Logan Wayne Merritt
Defendant:
Megan Benton, Thomas Fincham and Abe Shafer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larry Smith v. Kathleen Forsyth, et al
as 16-2201
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Larry Lee Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
Kathleen A. Forsyth, Jackson County Circuit Court Judge, Daryl Ryan Taylor, Attorney, Frank J. Murphy, Jackson County Circuit Court Attorney and others
Smith v. Forsyth et al
as 4:2016cv00291
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee Smith
Defendant:
Kathleen A Forsyth, Daryl Ryan Taylor, Frank J Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Todd Luh v. Corey Farnsworth, et al
as 12-3422
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Todd James Luh
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Mary Attebury, Dr. James Reynolds and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Corey f Farnsworth, Brigette Rose, Tyler Chavez and others
Todd Luh v. State of Missouri, et al
as 10-2539
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Todd James Luh
Defendant - Appellee:
State of Missouri, Mary Attebury, Dr. James Reynolds and others
Todd Luh v. State of Missouri, et al
as 09-1342
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Todd James Luh
Defendant - Appellee:
State of Missouri, Mary Attebury, Dr. James Reynolds and others
Luh v. Missouri, State of et al
as 5:2008cv06088
Plaintiff:
Todd James Luh
Defendant:
Missouri, State of, Mary Attebury, James Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Shafer v. U.S. Government et al
as 2:2007cv04068
Plaintiff:
David E. Shafer
Defendant:
U.S. Government, Central Division Prosecutor and Anthony Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shafer v. Knox et al
as 2:2007cv04070
Plaintiff:
David E. Shafer
Defendant:
William A Knox and Anthony Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shafer v. U.S. Government et al
as 2:2007cv04069
Plaintiff:
David E. Shafer
Defendant:
U.S. Government and William A Knox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
