Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Meranelli v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2022cv00946
Plaintiff:
Cherrity Honesty-Alexis Meranelli and Eric Sorenson
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lindsey v. Kneisel et al
as 0:2022cv00413
Plaintiff:
Dale Allen Lindsey
Defendant:
Terry Kneisel, Scott Benoit, Thane Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Prouty v. All current and past Health Services Employee's Employed at DHS-MSOP et al
as 0:2021cv02457
Plaintiff:
Darrell D. Prouty
Defendant:
All current and past Health Services Employee's Employed at DHS-MSOP, Melissa Class, Sharon K. Autio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prouty v. Johnson et al
as 0:2021cv02438
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dean Prouty
Defendant:
Nancy Johnson, Jodi Harpstead, Steve Sajdak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prouty v. Miles et al
as 0:2021cv02227
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dean Prouty
Defendant:
David Miles, Jessica Joyal, Steve Sajdak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prouty v. DHS-MSOP employees et al.
as 0:2021cv02207
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dean Prouty
Defendant:
DHS-MSOP employees, Nicole Kielty, Jessica Joyal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prouty v. Miles et al
as 0:2021cv02179
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dean Prouty
Defendant:
David Miles, Jeremy Wouri, Sue Swansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prouty v. Joyal et al
as 0:2021cv01847
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dean Prouty
Defendant:
D.H.S.-M.S.O.P, DHS-MSOP employees, Brooke Ness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miles v. Schiller et al
as 0:2019cv01914
Defendant:
John Does, Robert Rose, Shelby Hall and others
Plaintiff:
Gordon Miles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lindsey v. Skur et al
as 0:2017cv01499
Plaintiff:
Dale A. Lindsey
Defendant:
Rebecca Skur, Joe Mullen, Debbie Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
