Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Acosta v. Ayotlan, Inc.
as 4:2018cv00553
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Ayotlan, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v Luxury Floors, Inc. et al
as 0:2018cv01489
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Luxury Floors, Inc. and Ruben Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. RYA, Inc., et al
as 4:2018cv03068
Defendant:
AFJ, Inc., AYR, Inc., La Cacita, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Acosta v. Sunshine City, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv06051
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Sunshine City, Inc. and Zhou Xia Gao
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Acosta v. Rightway Homecare Services, Inc. et al
as 0:2018cv00784
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Rightway Homecare Services, Inc., Abebayo Mustapha and Abiola Mustapha
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Guadalajara, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00186
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Guadalajara, Inc. , La Alegria, Inc. , Los Foguis LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Acosta v. Osman
as 1:2018cv00049
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Osman, LLC d/b/a Country Haven Boarding Home, Bilkiss Chaudhry and Ali Chaudhry
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Acosta v. Tequilas Restaurants, Inc. (Nebraska) et al
as 7:2018cv05005
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Miguel Esparza, Tequilas Restaurants, Inc. (Colorado), Tequilas Restaurants, Inc. (Kansas) and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Acosta v. Totally Tan, Inc. et al
as 0:2017cv05508
Defendant:
Totally Tan, Inc., Nelson Marketing LLC, Donald Nelson and others
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. LaFata et al
as 4:2017cv02831
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Giovanni LaFata and Vito's in the Valley, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
