Cases 31 - 40 of 128
Stone Arch Studio LLC v. Richfield Inc. 1 et al
as 0:2019cv00929
Defendant:
XYZ Corporation, Richfield Inc. 1, ABC Partnership and others
Plaintiff:
Stone Arch Studio LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
My Pillow, Inc. v. Ontel Products Corporation
as 0:2019cv00903
Defendant:
Ontel Products Corporation, Does 1 through 7, Pegasus Home Fashions, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
My Pillow, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Stone Arch Studio LLC v. Sky Marketing LLC et al
as 0:2018cv03155
Defendant:
XYZ Corporation, Peace Inc, ABC Partnership and others
Plaintiff:
Stone Arch Studio LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
NRRM, LLC v. Doe
as 4:2018cv01899
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
NRRM, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
NRRM, LLC v. John Doe
as 4:2018cv01868
Defendant:
John Doe, dba automotiveguarantee.com and John Doe
Plaintiff:
NRRM, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
30 Watt Holdings, Inc. v. Tech and Goods, Inc. et al
as 0:2018cv03013
Defendant:
DOES 1-10 and Tech And Goods, Inc.
Plaintiff:
30 Watt Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Entrepreneur Media, Inc. v. Brimacomb & Associates et al
as 0:2018cv01957
Plaintiff:
Entrepreneur Media, Inc.
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Brimacomb & Associates d/b/a Club E and Brimacomb & Associates
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Global Merchandising Services, Ltd. v. Various John Does et al
as 4:2018cv01117
Defendant:
ABC Companies, Jane Does and Various John Does
Plaintiff:
Global Merchandising Services, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Interface Security Systems, L.L.C. v. Doe 1
as 4:2018cv00920
Plaintiff:
Interface Security Systems, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Live Nation Merchandise, Inc. v. Various John Does et al
as 4:2018cv00660
Plaintiff:
Live Nation Merchandise, Inc.
Defendant:
Various John Does, Various Jane Does and ABC Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
