Cases 151 - 160 of 15,693
Miller v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Kandie Ann Miller
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rundblad v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00422
Plaintiff:
Janine R. Rundblad
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rook v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Jason Rook
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Blevins v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Chad Blevins
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Davis v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Candy Davis
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gibbons v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00405
Plaintiff:
Ryan Gibbons
Defendant:
Martin O`Malley and Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Goodell v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Anna Marie Goodell
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Dees v. Kijakazi
as 6:2024cv03075
Plaintiff:
Danny Joe Dees
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Peck v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv03074
Plaintiff:
Louise Ann Peck
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Peth v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Jason Peth
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
