Cases 141 - 150 of 31,188
Perkins v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Jessica Diane Perkins
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bereckis v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Kim Bereckis
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Robertson v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
Damon Colter Robertson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Good v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Mark Good
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Kienast v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Amanda Kienast
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Barber v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Christina Barber
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Kimberly Britton v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-1438
Plaintiff:
Kimberly A. Britton
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of SSA
Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 8:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Michael Davis, Sr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Thao v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv01554
Plaintiff:
Reagies Thao
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Dunaiski v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv01520
Plaintiff:
Perry Dunaiski
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
