Cases 181 - 190 of 31,188
Wiley v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2024cv02051
Plaintiff:
Brian Wiley
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Brown v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv06037
Plaintiff:
Katrina L Brown
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Walz v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Rachel Walz
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Snelson v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Mary Snelson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Carr v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Connie Elaine Carr
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Barclift v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Nicole Barclift
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Russom v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 6:2024cv06036
Plaintiff:
Trinity Russom
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Tammy Spader v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-1683
Plaintiff:
Tammy L. Spader
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Tuttle v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv04052
Plaintiff:
Lisa L. Tuttle and Lisa Lee Tuttle
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hainline v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Joshua Blake Hainline
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
