Cases 21 - 30 of 651
Barker Stramm v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Brandi E. Barker Stramm
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Kraus v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00079
Plaintiff:
Brian E. Kraus
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sellers v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv00821
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Sellers, Jr
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Widener v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
Rebecca E. Widener
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration and SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ewald v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv04177
Plaintiff:
Jessica E. Ewald
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Helberg v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2022cv00293
Plaintiff:
James E Helberg
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Harleston v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2022cv02158
Plaintiff:
Jonathan E. Harleston
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Kesterson v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2022cv00603
Plaintiff:
Stephen E Kesterson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dameron v. Kijakazi
as 6:2022cv03185
Plaintiff:
Kyle E. Dameron
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Decker v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv04112
Plaintiff:
Mark E. Decker
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
