Cases 61 - 70 of 5,296
Minnesota Telecom Alliance v. FCC, et al
as 24-1179
Petitioner:
Minnesota Telecom Alliance
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
MCTA v. FCC, et al
as 24-1183
Petitioner:
Missouri Internet & Television Association
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Carl Haskell v. United States
as 24-1163
Petitioner:
Carl Haskell
Respondent:
United States of America
John Fortenberry v. United States
as 24-1165
Petitioner:
John Richard Fortenberry
Respondent:
United States of America
Oglala Sioux Tribe v. United States of America et al
as 5:2024cv05004
Plaintiff:
Oglala Sioux Tribe
Defendant:
United States of America, Deb Haaland, United States Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Lockenvitz et al v. United States of America et al
as 8:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Bradley Lockenvitz, John H. Lockenvitz, Sarah B. Lockenvitz and others
Counter Defendant:
Anthony Ceder
Defendant:
United States of America and Todd Van Housen
Counter Claimant:
Carlene Van Housen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Lemario Johnson v. United States
as 23-3780
Petitioner:
Lemario Quinntel Johnson
Respondent:
United States of America
The Brentwood Condominium Association v. United States of America et al
as 4:2023cv00892
Defendant:
Acacia Gentry, United States of America, Trustee of the Ray Sandy Sutton Revocable Trust and others
Plaintiff:
The Brentwood Condominium Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
Santee Sioux Nation v. Tso et al
as 8:2023cv00530
Plaintiff:
Santee Sioux Nation
Defendant:
Roselyn Tso, UNITED STATES INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE;, Xavier Becerra and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Dionne Gatling v. United States
as 23-3611
Petitioner:
Dionne Lamont Gatling
Respondent:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
