Cases 71 - 80 of 896
United States v. Scott Harry
as 22-1262
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Scott Michael Harry
Haas v. Stahr et al
as 4:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Barry Haas
Defendant:
Kristi Stahr, David Scott and Susan Inman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
United States v. Christopher Pfoff
as 22-1012
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Christopher Scott Pfoff
Scott Ready v. DST Systems, Inc.
as 21-4021
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Scott Ready
Defendant / Appellant:
DST Systems, Inc.
Fielding Kimery v. Scott Taylor, et al
as 21-3904
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Fielding Vaughn Kimery
Defendant / Appellee:
Scott Taylor, Captain, Varner SuperMax, Roosevelt Jones, Sergeant, Varner SuperMax, P. Harris, Sergeant, Varner SuperMax and others
Gene Scott v. United States
as 21-3859
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gene Edward Scott
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America
Alex Nelson, et al v. City of St. Louis, Missouri, et al
as 21-3740
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Alex Nelson and Iris Nelson
Defendant / Appellant:
City of St. Louis, Missouri, Gerald Leyshock, COI, in his individual and official capacities, Scott Boyher, LT., in his individual and official capacities and others
Defendant:
John Does 1-5, in their individual and official capacities, Charlene Deeken and John Does, 1-3
Mark Gullet v. City of St. Louis, et al
as 21-3745
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Mark Gullet
Defendant / Appellant:
City of St. Louis, Scott Boyher, LT., in his individual and official capacities, Timothy Sachs, LT., in his individual and official capacities and others
Defendant:
Charlene Deeken
Audrain County, Missouri et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 4:2021cv01388
Plaintiff:
Audrain County, Missouri, Chariton County, Missouri, Gasconade County, Missouri and others
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
