Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01737
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Powell, et al
as 3:2024cv05005
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Brock Powell and Courtney Faye Brock doing business as Shirley's Neighborhood Tavern
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unlawful interception of signals and programming services
Baldwin v. Devine et al
as 2:2023cv04206
Plaintiff:
Laura Marie Baldwin
Defendant:
Joshua Calvin Devine doing business as Circuit Judge, Callaway County 13th Circuit Court, Kevin M J Crane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv02070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv01250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Courtney Green v. General Mills World HQ, et al
as 23-1892
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Courtney Green
Defendant / Appellee:
General Mills World Headquarters and National Registered Agent Inc.
USA v. Courtney
as 6:2023cv03051
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Matthew Courtney
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4245 Petition to Determine Mental Status of Prisoner
Green v. General Mills World Headquarters et al
as 0:2022cv02737
Plaintiff:
Courtney Green
Defendant:
General Mills World Headquarters and National Registered Agent Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
United States v. Courtney Chicoine
as 22-2916
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Courtney Marie Chicoine
Courtney Harris v. United States
as 22-2358
Petitioner:
Courtney Harris
Respondent:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
