Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Northport Health Svcs. of Ark., et al v. USDHHS, et al
as 20-1799
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Civic Center Health and Rehabilitation, LLC, Crossville Health and Rehabilitation, LLC, Superior Health & Rehab, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex M. Azar, II, In his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Seema Verma, In her official capacity as the Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and others
Northport Health Services of Arkansas LLC et al v. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services et al
as 5:2019cv05168
Defendant:
Alex M. Azar, II, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Seema Verma and others
Plaintiff:
NWA Nursing Center, LLC, Northport Health Services of Arkansas, LLC, Atkins Care Center, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae:
Arkansas Trial Lawyers Association, American Association for Justice, Justice in Aging and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Southwest White County Water Association Public Water Authority of the State of Arkansas v. Beebe, City of et al
as 4:2015cv00052
Plaintiff:
Southwest White County Water Association Public Water Authority of the State of Arkansas
Defendant:
Beebe, City of and Water and Sewer Commission of the City of Beebe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Digital Recognition Network, et al v. Mike Beebe, et al
as 14-3084
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Digital Recognition Network, Inc. and Vigilant Solutions Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Mike Beebe, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Arkansas and Dustin McDaniel, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Arkansas
Digital Recognition Network Inc et al v. Beebe et al
as 4:2014cv00327
Plaintiff:
Digital Recognition Network Inc and Vigilant Solutions Inc
Defendant:
Mike Beebe and Dustin McDaniel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Calvin Carrick v. Mike Beebe, et al
as 14-1954
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Calvin Carrick
Defendant - Appellee:
Mike Beebe, In his official as Governor of Arkansas, Dustin McDaniel, In his official capacity as Attorney General of Arkansas and Larry Crane, In his official capacity as Clerk for Pulaski County
Carrick v. Beebe et al
as 4:2013cv00729
Plaintiff:
Calvin Carrick
Defendant:
Mike Beebe , Dustin McDaniel and Larry Crane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ron Teague, et al v. Jim Cooper, et al
as 12-2418
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ron Teague, on and behalf of minor children T.T. and S. T., Kathy Teague, on and behalf of minor children T.T. and S. T. and Rhonda Richardson, on and behalf of minor child A.R.
Plaintiff:
Darrin Hardy, on and behalf of minor child C.H., Julie Hardy, on and behalf of minor child C.H., Mark Draper, on and behalf of minor children A.D. and S. D. and others
Defendant:
Arkansas Board of Education, Dr. Naccaman Williams, in his official capacity, Sherry Burrow, in her official capacity and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Jim Cooper, in his official capacity, Brenda Gullett, in her official capacity, Samuel Ledbetter, in his official capacity and others
Ron Teague, et al v. Arkansas Board of Education, et al
as 12-2413
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ron Teague, on and behalf of minor children T.T. and S. T., Kathy Teague, on and behalf of minor children T.T. and S. T. and Rhonda Richardson, on and behalf of minor child A.R.
Plaintiff:
Darrin Hardy, on and behalf of minor child C.H., Julie Hardy, on and behalf of minor child C.H., Mark Draper, on and behalf of minor children A.D. and S. D. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Arkansas Board of Education, Jim Cooper, in his official capacity, Brenda Gullett, in her official capacity and others
Defendant:
Dr. Naccaman Williams, in his official capacity, Sherry Burrow, in her official capacity, White Hall School District and others
Frederick Banks v. Hillary Clinton, et al
as 12-2168
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Frederick Banks, An American Indian
Defendant / Appellee:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, Kathleen Sebelius, Internal Revenue Service and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
