Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Shyheim El-Mu'min v. Matthew Newman, et al
as 19-3393
Defendant:
J. Gobal, Major, Clinton Hyde, CO I, Robert Jameson, CO I and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Paul Schofield, Sergeant, Noel Maduka Obi, Correctional Case Manager, Matthew Newman, Sergeant and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Shyheim Deen El-Mu'min, also known as James I. Lenoir
Dr. Leonard Onyiah v. St. Cloud State University, et al
as 19-3162
Defendant / Appellee:
Minnesota State Colleges and Universities, Peiyi Zhao, in her individual and official capacities, Dale Buske, in his individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dr. Leonard Chukwualuka Onyiah
Toni Brill v. Mid-Century Insurance Company
as 19-1416
Defendant / Appellee:
Mid-Century Insurance Company, part of the Farmers Insurance Group of Companies
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Toni Brill, as the Trustee for the Surviving Next-of-Kin of Richard Brill, deceased
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00916
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv03121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Portley-El v. Brill, et al
as 0:1998cv02624
Plaintiff:
Patrick Portley-El
Defendant:
Hoyt Brill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Susan Yoshioka, et al v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.
as 08-8023
Not Classified By Court:
In re: Teflon Products Liability Litigation
Petitioner:
Susan R. Yoshioka, Kathleen Gebhardt, Janet R. Luett and others
Respondent:
E. I. DuPont De Nemours and Company
Susan Yoshioka, et al v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.
as 08-8023
:
In re: Teflon Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
Susan R. Yoshioka, Kathleen Gebhardt, Janet R. Luett and others
Defendant - Respondent:
E. I. DuPont De Nemours and Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
