Cases 1 - 10 of 138
United States v. Michael Hamer
as 24-1964
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michael Francis Hamer
United States v. Darron Mothershead
as 24-1878
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Darron Francis Mothershead
Bill Walmsley, et al v. FTC, et al
as 23-2687
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bill H. Walmsley, Jon Moss and Iowa Horsemen's Benevolent and Protective Association
Defendant / Appellee:
Federal Trade Commission, Lina M. Khan, Chair, Federal Trade Commission, Rebecca Kelly Slaughter, Commissioner, Federal Trade Commission and others
Walmsley et al v. Federal Trade Commission et al
as 3:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
Bill Walmsley, Jon Moss and Iowa Horsemen's Benevolent and Protective Association
Defendant:
Federal Trade Commission, Lina M Khan, Rebecca Kelly Slaughter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
United States v. Jonathan Speidel
as 23-1459
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jonathan Francis Speidel
United States v. Jonathan Speidel
as 23-1458
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jonathan Francis Speidel
United States v. Elmer Francis
as 22-2555
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Elmer Francis, also known as Nathan
Pounds v. U.S. Small Business Administration et al
as 4:2022cv00638
Plaintiff:
Francis Pounds
Defendant:
U.S. Small Business Administration, Isabella Casillas Guzman, Janet Yellen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00438
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
