Cases 1 - 6 of 6
David Schied v. United States, et al
as 21-2809
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Schied, one of the Sovereign American People, a totally and permanently disabled RECENT QUAD-AMPUTEE, CRIME VICTIM, Common Law and Civil Rights sui juris GRIEVANT/CLAIMANT/BENEFICIARY (BENEFICIARY/RELATOR)
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Donald Trump, in his public capacity as former U.S. PRESIDENT for the UNITED STATES, Denise Paige Hood, in her private capacity and public capacity as "chief judge" for the USDCEDM and others
Mason v. Entertainment Consulting International, LLC et al
as 4:2015cv00696
Plaintiff:
Clint A. Mason
Defendant:
Entertainment Consulting International, LLC , Entertainment Holdings, LLC , Lounge KC, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cusimano v. Lounge KC, LLC et al
as 4:2014cv00463
Plaintiff:
Glen Cusimano
Defendant:
Lounge KC, LLC , Entertainment Concepts Investors, LLC , The Cordish Companies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bell v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation, et al
as 0:2014cv00316
Plaintiff:
Johanna A. Bell
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corporation and Fictitious Defendants A, B, C, and D being those entities responsible for the design, development, testing, assembling, manufacture, packaging, labeling, preparing, distribution, marketing, supplying
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blondell Mitchell v. Rick Sanchez, et al
as 13-3318
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Blondell Mitchell
Defendant - Appellee:
Rick Sanchez, Unknown #4, filed as Rich Sanchez's staff and program manager's individually, Cable Network News, (CNN) and Responsible Management Teams (individually) and others
Davis et al v. Rapid Response, Inc. et al
as 5:2012cv05076
Plaintiff:
Shannon Humann Davis and Andy R. Davis
Defendant:
Rapid Response, Inc. and Mark A. Deprow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
