Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hamilton v. Wubker et al
as 4:2016cv00674
Plaintiff:
Clay D Hamilton, Sr
Defendant:
Steve Wubker, RX30 the Company, Transaction Data Systems Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meacham et al v. Bayer CropScience LP et al
as 4:2011cv00068
Plaintiff:
Kirby Meacham , Bill Webb , Lee Osborne and others
Defendant:
Bayer CropScience LP , Bayer CropScience Holding Inc and Bayer Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis et al
as 3:2010cv00281
Plaintiff:
Stanley Lewis, Harold T Housley, Jr, Tucker Housley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walt et al v. Bayer CropScience LP et al
as 5:2010cv00316
Plaintiff:
Lee Walt , Lee Walt Farms Partnership , Martin Walt, Jr and others
Defendant:
Bayer CropScience LP, Bayer CropScience Holding Inc, Bayer Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ziegenhorn et al
as 3:2010cv00263
Plaintiff:
Herbert D Ziegenhorn, Ziegenhorn Seed Farms Partnership, Fisher Seed Farms and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bradley et al v. Bayer CropScience LP et al
as 3:2010cv00171
Plaintiff:
Tony Bradley , Ray E Vester , GC Farms Partnership and others
Defendant:
Bayer CropScience LP, Bayer CropScience Holding Inc, Bayer CropScience LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coker et al v. Bayer CropScience LP et al
as 5:2009cv00234
Plaintiff:
Jay B Coker, Jay B Coker, Coker Farm Partnership and others
Defendant:
Bayer CropScience LP, Bayer CropScience Holding Inc, Bayer Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Lee County Arkansas v. Volvo Construction Equipment North America Inc et al
as 2:2007cv00082
Plaintiff:
Lee County Arkansas
Defendant:
Volvo Construction Equipment North America Inc, Cummins Inc, Scott Construction Equipment Company of Louisiana LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
