Cases 71 - 80 of 12,149
Vaughn v. City of Sikeston, Missouri et al
as 1:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Vaughn
Defendant:
City of Sikeston, Missouri, Jonathan Douglass, Barry Blevins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington et al v. City of St. Ann et al
as 4:2024cv00715
Plaintiff:
Warren Washington
Defendant:
City of St. Ann, Amy Poelker, Officer Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
McCoo v. BJC Health System et al
as 4:2024cv00714
Plaintiff:
Treina McCoo
Defendant:
BJC Health System doing business as BJC Healthcare, Sophia Easterling, Cassandra Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00711
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Austin v. McAtee et al
as 6:2024cv03154
Plaintiff:
Melinda Jo Austin
Defendant:
Dwayne McAtee and City of Niangua
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aunhkhotep v. Doe et al
as 4:2024cv00703
Plaintiff:
Aunhk Ra Aunhkhotep
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Police Officer Unknown Ebberhart, Police Captain Unknown Karnowski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00705
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Elliott v. Cowan et al
as 4:2024cv00354
Plaintiff:
Sarah Dawn Elliott
Defendant:
Matthew Cowan, Kearia Railey, Scott Childers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
