Cases 1 - 10 of 11
The Satanic Temple, et al v. Jeremiah Nixon, et al
as 16-3387
Plaintiff - Appellant:
The Satanic Temple and Mary Doe
Defendant - Appellee:
Jeremiah Jay Nixon, Governor of the State of Missouri and Chris Koster, Attorney General of the State of Missouri
The Satanic Temple et al v. Jeremiah Jay Nixon et al.
as 4:2015cv00986
Plaintiff:
Mary Doe and The Satanic Temple
Defendant:
Jeremiah Jay Nixon and Chris Koster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Johnson v. United States, et al
as 14-3535
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joseph Johnson, Pleading Doe, in their familial, estate/household members associations
Defendant - Appellee:
United States, Barack H. Obam, NSA and others
Johnson v. United States et al
as 4:2014cv01773
Plaintiff:
Joseph Johnson
Defendant:
United States, Barack H. Obama, NSA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thexton v. Nixon et al
as 4:2012cv01180
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R Thexton, Jr
Defendant:
Jeremiah Jay Nixon, Richard B Teitelman, Lisa White Hardwick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hamilton v. Nixon
as 4:2010cv01908
Plaintiff:
Maisha Imani Hamilton
Defendant:
Jeremiah "Jay" Nixon, Robin Carnahan, Mo Governor's Extradition Counsel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Williams et al
as 4:2008cv00967
Plaintiff:
Carmen Hill
Defendant:
Larry Williams, St. Louis Parking Violations Bureau, City of and Jeremiah "Jay" Nixon
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hill v. Fuhrer
as 4:2008cv00955
Plaintiff:
Carmen Hill
Defendant:
Jon E. Fuhrer, John Garvey, Missouri Bar Plan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hill v. Nixon et al
as 4:2008cv00855
Plaintiff:
Carmen Hill
Defendant:
Jeremiah "Jay" Nixon and Rodney Sippel
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Hill v. Mullen et al
as 4:2008cv00856
Plaintiff:
Carmen Hill
Defendant:
Michael Mullen, South and Associates PC Law Firm, Chase Home Finance LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
