Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Clervrain et al v. Krebs et al
as 4:2022cv04047
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Niva Guerrier
Defendant:
Shantel Krebs, Kristi Noem, Jason Ravnsborg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv04062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
F.L. et al v. South Dakota High School Activities Association et al
as 4:2018cv04038
Plaintiff:
F. L. and Stephanie Linden
Defendant:
South Dakota High School Activities Association , Bud Postma and Daniel Swartos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv05015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv04172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Lee et al v. Ecoffey
as 5:2013cv05019
Plaintiff:
Patrick A. Lee, Floyd Hand and William J. Bielecki, Sr.
Defendant:
Robert Ecoffey, Ruth Brown, Jim Meeks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Blechinger v. Sioux Falls Housing and Redevelopment Commission et al
as 4:2012cv04004
Plaintiff:
Robert F. Blechinger
Defendant:
Sioux Falls Housing and Redevelopment Commission and Kevin VanPeursem
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Blechinger v. Sioux Falls Housing and Redevelopment Commission
as 4:2011cv04069
Plaintiff:
Robert F. Blechinger
Defendant:
Sioux Falls Housing and Redevelopment Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Blechinger v. Sioux Falls Housing and Redevelopment Commission
as 4:2011cv04609
Plaintiff:
Robert F. Blechinger
Defendant:
Sioux Falls Housing and Redevelopment Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv04068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
