Cases 21 - 30 of 69
Geitz et al v. Koster et al
as 4:2015cv00269
Plaintiff:
James B. Geitz, Roger Blum and Kenneth Christner
Defendant:
Chris Koster, George A. Lombardi, Ellis McSwain, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weaver v. McSwain, Jr. et al
as 4:2015cv00020
Plaintiff:
Joseph Antonio Weaver
Defendant:
Ellis McSwain, Jr., Julie Kempker, Nancy McCarthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biddy v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2014cv02059
Petitioner:
George Randall Biddy
Respondent:
Missouri Department of Corrections , George A. Lombardi , Division of Board of Probation and Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wolford v. McSwain et al
as 2:2014cv00106
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Wolford
Defendant:
Elllis McSwain, Jr., Chuck Pryor, James Wells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacobs v. Spackler et al
as 4:2014cv01082
Petitioner:
Timothy Jacobs
Respondent:
Heath Spackler and Ellis McSwain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ritz v. Prudden et al
as 4:2014cv00649
Petitioner:
Chris K. Ritz
Respondent:
Douglas J. Prudden, George Lombardi and Ellis McSwain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Weber v. Lombardi et al
as 2:2014cv04167
Plaintiff:
James Weber
Defendant:
George Lombardi and Ellis McSwain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Murphy v. Ellis McSwain, et al
as 14-1704
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Dunham Murphy
Defendant:
Missouri Board of Probation & Parole, Board Member/Employe John Doe, (# 1-99) and Board Member/Employe Jane Doe, (# 1-99)
Defendant - Appellee:
Ellis McSwain, Chuck Prior and Chuck Pryor
Keith Young v. Rhonda Pash, et al
as 14-1533
Petitioner - Appellant:
Keith Stanley Young
Respondent - Appellee:
Rhonda Pash and Ellis McSwain, Jr.
Murphy v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole et al
as 2:2014cv04031
Plaintiff:
Michael Dunham Murphy
Defendant:
Missouri Board of Probation & Parole, Ellis McSwain, Chuck Prior and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
