Cases 31 - 40 of 476
Goldsmith v. Jones et al
as 1:2023cv00135
Plaintiff:
Noah James Goldsmith
Defendant:
Mike Jones, Mark Dobbs, Bethany Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Saling v. Barnes et al
as 4:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Phillip Saling
Defendant:
Steven Pelton, Scott Duck, Michael Delatorre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roe v. Precythe et al
as 2:2023cv04129
Plaintiff:
Jane Roe
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Doris Falkenrath, Jay Cassady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00780
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1455 Procedure for Removal Criminal Prosecutions
Armstrong v. Ward et al
as 4:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Christopher C. Armstrong
Defendant:
Christina Ward, Scott Westlacht and Robert Shively
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Ward et al
as 4:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
Christopher C. Armstrong
Defendant:
Christina Ward, Scott Westlacht and Robert Shively
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spiker v. Anders et al
as 4:2023cv00338
Plaintiff:
Vincent E. Spiker
Defendant:
Scott Anders, Unknown Hayward, Mr. Unknown Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schuch v. Johnson County, Missouri et al
as 4:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
Nancy Schuch
Defendant:
Johnson County, Missouri, Scott Munsterman and City of Blue Springs, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Ward et al
as 4:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
Christopher C. Armstrong
Defendant:
Christina Ward, Scott Westlacht and Robert Shively
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cush-El v. Anders
as 4:2023cv00046
Petitioner:
Peace Elluvasun Allah Cush-El
Respondent:
Scott Anders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
