Cases 41 - 50 of 1,254
Akouala v. AGU Logistic et al
as 3:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Christian Akouala
Defendant:
AGU Logistic, Court of Works. Comp., Mac Schneider and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Schuh v. Burgum et al
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Ricky R. Schuh
Defendant:
Doug Burgum, Dave Krabbenhoft, Colby Braun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frank v. North Dakota, State of et al
as 3:2023cv00234
Plaintiff:
Joshua David Frank
Defendant:
North Dakota, State of, Fargo Police Department, Police Officer Toby Carlsson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knorr v. Cass County Jail
as 3:2023cv00240
Plaintiff:
Gerald Knorr
Defendant:
Cass County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Etemad v. North Dakota Department of Corrections
as 1:2023cv00216
Petitioner:
Bejan David Etemad
Respondent:
North Dakota Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Olson v. Cass County Sheriff et al
as 3:2023cv00179
Plaintiff:
Ricky A. Olson
Defendant:
Cass County Sheriff, Three Deputy Sheriffs, Cass County Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoff v. Davis et al
as 1:2023cv00173
Plaintiff:
Kevin Hoff
Defendant:
Heather Davis, Anthony Holly and Joseph Joyce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Cass County Jail
as 3:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Williams
Defendant:
Cass County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hoff v. LeFevre
as 3:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Kevin Hoff
Defendant:
Troy LeFevre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cartwright v. Youngbird et al
as 1:2023cv00158
Plaintiff:
Walter William Cartwright, III
Defendant:
Patricia Youngbird and Marylee Pollman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
