Cases 51 - 60 of 476
Wells v. USA
as 6:2022cv03278
Petitioner:
Scott Wells
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Leonard v. Scott
as 4:2022cv00939
Plaintiff:
Jamie Leonard
Defendant:
Kristian Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dutcher v. Precythe et al
as 2:2022cv04124
Plaintiff:
Michael Dutcher
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Doris Falkenrath, Raina Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huskey Jr. v. Corizon/Centurion et al
as 2:2022cv04122
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lee Huskey Jr.
Defendant:
Corizon/Centurion, Dr. Lovelace, Beth Clad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Wilson
as 4:2022cv00603
Petitioner:
Rodney Scott Brown
Respondent:
Aaron Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Scott et al
as 6:2022cv03204
Plaintiff:
Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
R. Scott, Dr. Moose, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mosley et al v. Whistler et al
as 1:2022cv00096
Plaintiff:
Ryan Scott Mosley
Defendant:
Joseph Whistler, Josiah Mehl and City of Cape Girardeau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wagner v. St. Louis County et al
as 4:2022cv00703
Plaintiff:
ReKwane Shevell Wagner
Defendant:
St. Louis County, Scott Anders, St. Louis County Jail Medical Supervisor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hower v. Dr. Scott et al
as 2:2022cv04098
Plaintiff:
Skylar A Hower and Skyler A Hower
Defendant:
Dr. Scott, Dr. Jane Doe, Bales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elmore v. Maries County, Missouri et al
as 4:2022cv00617
Plaintiff:
Linda Elmore
Defendant:
Victor Stratman, Ed Fagre, Doug Drewel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
