Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 7,120
Chilton v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00065
Plaintiff: Brett Michaels Chilton
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nyemah v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv04057
Plaintiff: Harry Nyemah
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Clifton Cannon v. United States
as 24-1655
Petitioner: Clifton Terrell Cannon
Respondent: United States of America
April Paw v. United States
as 24-1667
Plaintiff: April Paw
Defendant: United States of America
Marlin Thomas v. United States, et al
as 24-1662
Plaintiff: Marlin Santana Thomas
Defendant: United States of America, Virginia Bruner, Former Assistant United States Attorney, in an individual and official capacity, Amy L Jennings, Assistant United States Attorney, in an individual and official capacity and others
Jason Bates v. United States
as 24-1643
Petitioner: Jason D. Bates
Respondent: United States of America
Clyde Johnson, II v. United States, et al
as 24-1644
Plaintiff: Clyde Bernard Johnson, II
Defendant: United States of America, Stephanie Swords, Doctor, USMCFP, Collins, Doctor, USMCFP and others
Frencher v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00112
Petitioner: Johnnathan Monroe Frencher
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Godfrey v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv03010
Plaintiff: Sylvan Godfrey
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Chilton v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00055
Petitioner: Brett Michaels Chilton
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?