Cases 1 - 10 of 83
Troy Williams v. Doe, et al
as 20-2041
Defendant / Appellee:
AT&T Phone Company Tycoon, Jay Nixon, Former Missouri Governor, Donald W. Hinton, Doctor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Troy Williams
Donald v. Nixon
as 4:2019cv01037
Plaintiff:
Gregory L Donald
Defendant:
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald et al v. Nixon et al
as 4:2017cv00496
Plaintiff:
Gregory L Donald and Tina M Donald
Defendant:
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Todd M. Schultz and Jackson County Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Missouri Department of Mental Health et al
as 4:2017cv01521
Plaintiff:
Rayfield Johnson
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Mental Health, Fulton State Hospital, Mark Stringer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Betts v. Boone County Jail et al
as 2:2017cv04015
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Sherron Betts
Defendant:
Boone County Jail, Metropolitan St. Louis Psychiatric Center, Edwin Wolfgram and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Belfield v. State of Missouri, et al
as 16-4566
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael G. Belfield
Defendant - Appellee:
State of Missouri, Franklin County, Washington County and others
Melvin Tyler v. Jeremiah Nixon, et al
as 16-3464
Petitioner - Appellant:
Melvin Leroy Tyler
Respondent - Appellee:
Jeremiah (Jay) Nixon and Dave Dormire
Harry Campbell, III v. Mike Sharp, et al
as 16-1865
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Harry G. Campbell, III
Defendant - Appellee:
Mike Sharp, Jackson County Sheriff, Jane Doe #1, Jackson County Deputy Sheriff, John Doe #1, Jackson County Deputy Sheriff and others
Williams v. Reynolds et al
as 5:2016cv06040
Plaintiff:
Troy Williams
Defendant:
James B Reynolds, Michael Correale, Karen Digh Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Sharp et al
as 4:2015cv00745
Plaintiff:
Harry G Campbell, III
Defendant:
Mike Sharp, Jane Doe # 1, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
