Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Thompson v. Haper et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Terrique Thompson
Defendant:
Unknown Haper, Unknown Womack, C. Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. USA
as 6:2024cv03163
Petitioner:
Antonieo E. Murphy
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
K.D.H. v. Boone County, Missouri et al
as 2:2024cv04084
Plaintiff:
K. D. H.
Defendant:
Boone County, Missouri, Daymon Reynolds, Christie McCalebb and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Gilmore v. Sheets et al
as 4:2024cv00743
Plaintiff:
Arlantis J. Gilmore
Defendant:
Charles Sheets, Geoffrey Ryan Rose, Ryan J. Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper v. Monnig et al
as 4:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Christopher Louis Harper
Defendant:
Shane Monnig, Timothy Baker, Adam Lemmonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walton v. St. Louis City Police Department et al
as 4:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Walton
Defendant:
St. Louis City Police Department, Brandon Wyms and Terron Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pullum v. Murphy et al
as 6:2022cv03195
Plaintiff:
Dameion D Pullum
Defendant:
Sean Murphy, Jane Doe, Anne L. Precythe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Greene County Missouri et al
as 6:2022cv03176
Plaintiff:
Chad Murphy
Defendant:
Greene County Missouri and Donaldson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Scofield et al
as 2:2021cv04234
Plaintiff:
Elex Levell Murphy
Defendant:
Scofield and Atcheson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Corizon Health , Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04121
Defendant:
Sarah A Collins, Clark, Corizon Health, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Elex Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
