Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Taft et al v. Reynolds et al
as 5:2023cv04059
Plaintiff:
David Lynn Taft, Jr, Arthur James Triplett, Jr, Jason Lee Cook and others
Defendant:
Kim Reynolds, Terry Branstad, Kelly Garcia and others
Interested Party:
Robert Thole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caldwell v. Turner et al
as 5:2023cv04054
Interested Party:
Robert Thole
Plaintiff:
Rocky Joe Caldwell
Defendant:
Cory Turner, Everett Fowler, Jared Rapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips et al v. Turner et al
as 5:2018cv04039
Plaintiff:
Donald E Phillips and David Lynn Taft, Jr
Defendant:
Cory Turner, Dan Pingle, Adam Rapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Duckworth v. Robert Rapp
as 15-2716
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joseph Howard Duckworth
Defendant - Appellee:
Robert E. Rapp, Ralls County Prosecuting Attorney
Duckworth v. Rapp
as 2:2015cv00049
Plaintiff:
Joseph Howard Duckworth
Defendant:
Robert Rapp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mead v. Palmer et al
as 5:2015cv04055
Plaintiff:
Marvin Allen Mead
Defendant:
Charles Palmer , Brad Wittrock , Bryce Richter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duckworth v. Rapp
as 4:2015cv00493
Plaintiff:
Joseph Howard Duckworth
Defendant:
Robert Rapp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eddie Risdal v. Mike Nixon, et al
as 13-2545
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Eddie C. Risdal
Defendant - Appellant:
Mike Nixon, Psychiatric Security Specialist, Adam Rapp, Psychiatric Security Specialist, Glen McCannon, Psychiatric Security Specialist and others
Martin v. Krantz et al
as 4:2011cv00556
Plaintiff:
Vidal J Martin
Defendant:
Bryan D Krantz, Joseph Megerman, Robert Shieber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Risdal et al v. Smith et al DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE - DOCKET IN LEAD CASE C05-4065 DEO
as 5:2011cv04035
Plaintiff:
Eddie C Risdal and David Taft
Defendant:
Jason Smith , Mike Nixon , Adam Rapp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
