Cases 41 - 48 of 48
United States of America v. $89,599.12 in United States Currency
as 5:2011cv05068
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$89,599.12 in United States Currency
Claimant:
Jamie Giles
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. 2005 Cadillac STS, VIN#1G6DC67A150140952 et al
as 1:2010cv01067
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
2005 Cadillac STS, VIN#1G6DC67A150140952 and $1821.00 in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. $12,461.00 in United States Currency
as 2:2010cv02081
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$12,461.00 in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. $73,435.00 In United States Currency
as 6:2009cv06046
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$73,435.00 In United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. One 2003 White Chevrolet Van, VIN 1GCEG15X331180988 et al
as 5:2008cv05100
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
One 2003 White Chevrolet Van, VIN 1GCEG15X331180988, One 2002 Black Sierra Truck, VIN 2GTEK19T621215909, One 2000 White International Truck, VIN 1HTSDAAM7YH253577 and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
USA v. $19100 in United States Currency
as 4:2007cv01191
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$19100 in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. $10,375.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 5:2007cv05128
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$10,375.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. $9,950.00 in United States Currency
as 2:2007cv02067
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$9,950.00 in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
