Cases 31 - 40 of 780
MO-Kan Teamsters Pension Fund et al v. Prudent Technologies, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00284
Plaintiff:
MO-Kan Teamsters Pension Fund, MO-Kan Teamsters Health & Welfare Fund, Teamsters Local Union No 541 Vacation-Holiday Fund and others
Defendant:
Prudent Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Trimark Hotel Corporation v. IUOE
as 22-1836
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Trimark Hotel Corporation, a Texas corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
International Union of Operating Engineers, Local Union No. 70
Local 513, International Union of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO et al v. R & K Excavation, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00460
Plaintiff:
Local 513, International Union of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO, Timothy J. Sappington, Local Union 513 Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
R & K Excavation, Inc., Roger P. Faulkner and Marilyn Faulkner
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund et al v. CMT Roofing, LLC
as 4:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund, Board of Trustees, Construction Laborers Pension Trust of Greater St. Louis and others
Defendant:
CMT Roofing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund et al v. Spray Services, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund, Board of Trustees, Construction Laborers Pension Trust of Greater St. Louis and others
Defendant:
Spray Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Cons. Laborers Welfare Fund, et al v. RoadSafe Traffic Systems, Inc.
as 22-1050
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund, an employee benefit plan, Board of Trustees of the Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund, Construction Laborers Pension Trust of Greater St. Louis and others
Defendant / Appellee:
RoadSafe Traffic Systems, Inc.
St. Louis Glass and Allied Industries Health & Welfare Insurance Fund et al v. McGill
as 4:2021cv01479
Plaintiff:
St. Louis Glass and Allied Industries Health & Welfare Insurance Fund, Glaziers Architectural and Glassworkers Local 513 Division A Pension Fund, Glaziers Architectural and Glassworkers Local 513 Division A, Glazier Unit Money Purchase Plan and others
Defendant:
Robert McGill, III
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Trustees of the International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail, and Transportation Workers (SMART) Local Union No. 36 Welfare Fund et al v. Show-Me Heating & Air Conditioning
as 4:2021cv01377
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail, and Transportation Workers (SMART) Local Union No. 36 Welfare Fund, Trustees of the International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail, and Transportation Workers (SMART) Local Union No. 36 Joint Apprenticeship Fund, Board of Directors of the St. Louis Metal Working Industry Fund and others
Defendant:
Show-Me Heating & Air Conditioning
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
The Citizens Bank of the Midwest v. International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, District Council No. 58, AFL-CIO et al
as 6:2021cv03286
Plaintiff:
The Citizens Bank of the Midwest
Defendant:
International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, District Council No. 58, AFL-CIO and Painters Local Union No. 1265
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Trustees of the Cedar Rapids Sheet Metal Workers Local 263 Health & Welfare Fund et al v. Modern Sheet Metal, Inc
as 1:2021cv00110
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Cedar Rapids Sheet Metal Workers Local 263 Health & Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Local Union No. 263 Retirement Savings Plan and Trustees of the Cedar Rapids Sheet Metal Workers Local 263 Health and Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Modern Sheet Metal, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
