Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Rogers v. Hughes et al
as 2:2024cv02063
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rogers
Defendant:
Sheriff Tom Hughes and Johnson County, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ruebel et al v. Tyson Foods, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv05216
Plaintiff:
Randall W. Ruebel, Mario Hudson and Tammy L. Johnson
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc. and Board of Directors of Tyson Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Johnson v. Tasty Chick'n LLC
as 3:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Brandy Johnson
Defendant:
Tasty Chick'n LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Johnson v. WalMart, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02059
Plaintiff:
Carl Lee Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
WalMart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Adkins et al v. Flash Market LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00858
Plaintiff:
Khurshonda Adkins, Elizabeth Alvarez, Jalyn Anthony and others
Defendant:
Flash Market LLC and PFMFC Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Margrave v. Rotech Healthcare Inc
as 4:2022cv00015
Plaintiff:
Johnson Margrave
Defendant:
Rotech Healthcare Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Johnson, Jr. v. Driven Brands, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02144
Plaintiff:
Harvie Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Driven Brands, INC. and Driven Brands Shared Services, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Johnson v. 1st Choice Flooring, LLC
as 5:2021cv05129
Plaintiff:
Roy Johnson
Defendant:
1st Choice Flooring, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Allshouse v. The Joshua Agency, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01032
Plaintiff:
Donna Allshouse
Defendant:
The Joshua Agency, LLC and Cory Johnson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Johnson v. Ozark Mountain Poultry, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv05075
Defendant:
George's, Inc. and Ozark Mountain Poultry, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
