Cases 171 - 180 of 355
Cameron et al v. Iowa Board of Medicine for the Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2016cv00085
Plaintiff:
Jamesen John Cameron and Jason Harkrider
Defendant:
Iowa Board of Medicine for the Department of Corrections, Frank Filippelli and Noble Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hofer v. Iowa Department of Corrections, et al
as 4:2016cv00080
Plaintiff:
Roger Allan Hofer
Defendant:
Iowa Department of Corrections, IMCC Medical Committee, Frank Fillipelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Iowa Department of Corrections
as 4:2016cv00034
Petitioner:
Charles Henry Armstrong
Respondent:
Iowa Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00456
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2ot Job Discrimination (other)
Armstrong v. Iowa Department of Corrections
as 3:2015cv03166
Petitioner:
Charles Henry Armstrong
Respondent:
Iowa Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Walker v. Iowa Department of Corrections
as 4:2015cv00254
Plaintiff:
Keith Walker
Defendant:
Iowa Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Iowa Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2015cv00248
Plaintiff:
Randall Wayne Martin
Defendant:
Iowa Department of Corrections, Gail Huckins, Jana Hacker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapman v. Iowa Department of Corrections
as 4:2015cv00205
Plaintiff:
Billie Joe Chapman
Defendant:
Iowa Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stuhr v. Iowa Department of Corrections
as 3:2015cv03104
Plaintiff:
Scott Michael Stuhr
Defendant:
Iowa Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stuhr v. Iowa Department of Corrections
as 4:2015cv00082
Plaintiff:
Scott Michael Stuhr
Defendant:
Iowa Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
