Cases 11 - 20 of 146
Powell v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv00893
Plaintiff:
Mark Powell
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Warden Hancock, Major Minchue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conn v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv00891
Plaintiff:
Dallas Conn
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Warden Hancock, Major Minchue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitley v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv00898
Plaintiff:
D'Andre Whitley
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Warden Hancock, Major Minchue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv00890
Plaintiff:
Thomas May
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Warden Hancock, Major Minchue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv00889
Plaintiff:
LaJuan Hayes
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Warden Hancock, Major Minchue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv00892
Plaintiff:
Adrian Shaw
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Warden Hancock, Major Minchue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson et al v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv00869
Plaintiff:
David Wilson, Chris DeWeese, Demeyon Watie and others
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Warden Hancock, Major Minchue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Vandergriff
as 4:2023cv00845
Petitioner:
Johnny A. Johnson
Respondent:
Warden David Vandergriff and David Vandergriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00116
Petitioner:
Jim R. Harris, Jr.
Respondent:
Uknown Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Urban v. Warden Blair
as 2:2023cv04070
Petitioner:
Joshua Robert Urban
Respondent:
Warden Blair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
