Cases 11 - 20 of 808
Kennemore v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
Daniel Eldon Kennemore
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Donna Anderson, Stacey Neff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Debi Jo Anderson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Webster v. Anderson et al
as 2:2024cv04024
Plaintiff:
Derrick Orlando Webster
Defendant:
Jeffrey Anderson, Dywayne Hoffstetter, William Bresnaham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Human v. Anderson Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
Daniel Human
Defendant:
Anderson Corporation doing business as Renewal by Anderson and John and Jane Does 1 through 4
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Kennemore v. Anderson et al
as 4:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Daniel Eldon Kennemore
Defendant:
Bill Anderson and Charles McIntire
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hilt v. Anderson
as 4:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Dallas Cody Hilt
Defendant:
Chad Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hilt v. Liberty Police Department et al
as 4:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Dallas Cody Hilt
Defendant:
Liberty Police Department, Bledsoe, Heidi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. QuikTrip Corporation
as 4:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Lionel Anderson
Defendant:
QuikTrip Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
McGee v. Anderson et al
as 4:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Kevin D. McGee
Defendant:
Donna Anderson and Felix Vincentz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
