Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Dial v. Levy, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv01581
Plaintiff: Paulette Dial
Defendant: St. Louis Neurosurgery, L.L.C., Armond Levy and Christian Hospital Northeast
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones-El v. Stange et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00005
Plaintiff: Eugene K. Jones-El
Defendant: Bill Stange, Ian Wallace, Paula Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Snyder et al v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2014cv02738
Plaintiff: Armond W. Snyder and Marilynn J. Snyder
Defendant: Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hartley v. Gonzales et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2007cv01518
Plaintiff: Damon Armond Hartley
Defendant: Alberto R. Gonzales, Carl R. Anderson, Victor Vega and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Markle et al v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
as 0:2007cv03468
Plaintiff: Heather Lee Markle, Heather Lee Markle, Heather Lee Markle and others
Defendant: C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Markle et al v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
as 4:2007cv00428
Plaintiff: Heather Lee Markle, Heather Lee Markle, Theresa Marie Meyer and others
Defendant: C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Markle et al v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
as 4:2007cv00018
Plaintiff: Heather Lee Markle, Heather Lee Markle, Theresa Marie Meyer and others
Defendant: C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. and C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?