Cases 11 - 20 of 59
Jones v. Jane or John Doe #1 et al
as 5:2022cv05056
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Jane or John Doe #1, Jane or John Doe #2 and Jane and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Jones, Sr. v. Dexter Payne
as 22-1423
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Jones, Sr.
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Jones v. Kohlmann
as 4:2021cv01142
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Jones, Sr
Defendant:
Lauren Kohlmann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Kohlmann
as 5:2021cv05202
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Lauren Kohlmann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Jones, Sr. v. Josephine Griffin, et al
as 20-2769
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles Edward Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Doe, Chief Justice, Arkansas Supreme Court, David John Sachar, Executive Director, Judicial Discipline and Disability Commission, Herbert T. Wright, Circuit Judge, Pulaski County and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Josephine T. Griffin, Circuit Clerk, Chicot County and Lena Ruals, Deputy Circuit Clerk, Chicot County
Charles Jones, Sr. v. Dexter Payne
as 20-2266
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Jones, Sr.
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Jones v. Payne
as 4:2020cv00550
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Jones, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
United States v. Charles Jones
as 19-3161
Defendant / Appellant:
Charles J. Jones
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Charles Jones, Sr. v. Josephine Griffin, et al
as 19-1732
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles Edward Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Doe, Chief Justice, Arkansas Supreme Court, David John Sachar, Executive Director, Judicial Discipline and Disability Commission, Herbert T. Wright, Circuit Judge, Pulaski County and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Josephine T. Griffin, Circuit Clerk, Chicot County and Lena Ruals, Deputy Circuit Clerk, Chicot County
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
