Cases 11 - 20 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00094
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Aday Express Inc. v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
as 4:2021cv01243
Plaintiff:
Aday Express Inc.
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. FedEx
as 4:2021cv00980
Plaintiff:
Fred Williams
Defendant:
FedEx
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Grier et al v. FedEx Freight, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00588
Plaintiff:
Carol Grills, Rachel Drawbond and Ryan Grier
Defendant:
Clinton F. Britton, Jr. and FedEx Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rugh v. Fedex Freight, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv01566
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
DAVID K STEVENS and FEDEX FREIGHT, INC.
Plaintiff:
ANGELA INEZ RUGH and Angela Rugh
3Rd Party Defendant:
David Sledd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. FedEx Ground Packaging Systems, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00517
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Packaging Systems, Inc. and James Petrik
Plaintiff:
Benjamin A Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson et al v. United States et al
as 4:2020cv00679
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L.G. Johnson, Jerry Arnaz Johnson and Joseph Johnson
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, James A. Pudlowski, United States Court of Appeals Federal Circuit and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
