Cases 11 - 18 of 18
R. et al v. THE DOE RUN RESOURCES CORPORATION et al
as 4:2013cv01596
Plaintiff:
G. M.A. R. , E. I.C. A. , J. C. L. and others
Defendant:
THE DOE RUN RESOURCES CORPORATION , D.R. Acquisition Corp. , Marvin K. Kaiser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
H & M Goldenberg II, L.L.L.P. v. Dow Roofing Systems LLC
as 4:2013cv01340
Plaintiff:
H & M Goldenberg II, L.L.L.P.
Defendant:
Dow Roofing Systems LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Default
Cargill, Inc. v. H & M Farms, Inc.
as 13-1031
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Cargill, Incorporated
Defendant:
Kurt Kroeger and Kathy Kroeger
Defendant - Appellant:
H & M Farms, Inc.
H & M, Inc. v. United States of America
as 2:2012cv00083
Plaintiff:
H & M, Inc.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Recovery of IRS Tax
H & M Farms, Inc. v. Cargill, Incorporated et al
as 8:2012cv00101
Defendant:
Cargill, Incorporated and Leon Vanden Berge
Plaintiff:
H & M Farms, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Sr. Kate Reid, et al v. Doe Run Resources Corp., et al
as 12-1067
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Sr. Kate Reid, Megan Heeney, as next friends of, K. G. C. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Doe Run Resources Corporation, a New York Corporation, D. R. Acquisition Corp., a Missouri Corporation, Marvin K. Kaiser and others
Cargill, Incorporated v. Kroeger et al
as 8:2011cv00081
Counter Defendant:
Cargill, Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Cargill, Incorporated
Counter Claimant:
H & M Farms, Inc., Kathy Kroeger and Kurt Kroeger
Defendant:
H & M Farms, Inc., Kathy Kroeger and Kurt Kroeger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
C. et al v. Doe Run Resources Corporation et al
as 4:2011cv00045
Plaintiff:
Kate Reid , Megan Heeney , K. G. C. and others
Defendant:
Doe Run Resources Corporation , D.R. Acquisition Corp. , Marvin K. Kaiser and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
