Cases filed in Missouri
Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Dunn v. Mattivi et al
as 4:2013cv00092
Plaintiff: Adrian L. Dunn, Sr.
Defendant: Michael Mattivi, John 1 Doe and John 2 Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Herrington v. Nixon et al
as 5:2013cv06022
Defendant: Jeremiah W. Nixon, George Lombardi, MO Board of Probation & Parole and others
Plaintiff: Jacob Andrew Herrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randolph v. Lombardi et al
as 2:2012cv04325
Plaintiff: Gary Randolph
Defendant: George Lombardi, Douglas Prudden, John I Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holly v. Corwin et al
as 4:2012cv01432
Plaintiff: Rodrick D. Holly
Defendant: James Corwin, John I Doe, John 2 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Doe et al
as 2:2012cv04239
Plaintiff: Cedric Arnez Gibson
Defendant: John I Doe, John 2 Doe and John 3 Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitehead v. Lombardi et al
as 2:2012cv04183
Plaintiff: David Levi Whitehead
Defendant: George A. Lombardi, Missouri Department of Corrections, Matt Sturm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ring & Ring LLC v. Trapp et al
as 2:2012cv04157
Plaintiff: Ring & Ring LLC
Defendant: Samuel E. Trapp , Zesto's LLC , John I Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Singleton v. Snodgrass et al
as 4:2012cv00709
Plaintiff: Jeffrey W Singleton
Defendant: Ron Snodgrass, St. Clair County, John 1 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stewart v. Miller et al
as 2:2012cv04160
Plaintiff: Marvin L. Stewart, Sr.
Defendant: Mark Miller, John I Doe, John 2 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ali v. Samuels et al
as 6:2012cv03255
Plaintiff: Abdus-Shahid M.S. Ali
Defendant: Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Harley G Lappin, Juan D. Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?