Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Saint Francis Medical Center et al v. Walsh et al
as 1:2016cv00270
Plaintiff:
Saint Francis Medical Center
Defendant:
Robert Walsh and Karen Walsh
Third_party_defendant:
Missouri Cooperatives Employees Health Care Fund
Counter_claimant:
Karen Walsh and Robert Walsh
Counter_defendant:
Saint Francis Medical Center
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Robert Walsh and Karen Walsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Zhai v. Saint Francis Medical Center, et al
as 4:2016cv03049
Defendant:
Philip Cahoy, Central Nebraska Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, P.C., Sun Ik Lee and others
Plaintiff:
Wenjia Zhai
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Gannon et al v. Bittle et al
as 1:2016cv00001
Plaintiff:
Kelly J. Gannon and Shane A. Matlock
Defendant:
Bradley K. Bittle and Saint Francis Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2554
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Saint Francis Medical Center v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 10-2319
Plaintiff:
Southeast Missouri Hospital
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Saint Francis Medical Center
Defendant - Appellee:
C.R. Bard, Inc.
Defendant:
Tyco International, Inc., Tyco Health Care Group and John Does 1-10
Saint Francis Medical Center v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 09-3325
Plaintiff:
Southeast Missouri Hospital
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Saint Francis Medical Center
Defendant - Appellee:
C.R. Bard, Inc.
Defendant:
Tyco International, US, Inc., Tyco Health Care Group and John Does 1-10
Amicus On Behalf Of Appellant:
Attorney General of the State of Missouri
C.R. Bard v. Southeast Missouri Hospital, et al
as 08-8016
Petitioner:
C.R. Bard, Inc.
Respondent:
Southeast Missouri Hospital and Saint Francis Medical Center
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
