Cases 21 - 30 of 196
Hopkins v. Hancock
as 2:2023cv04165
Petitioner:
Rickey Lee Hopkins
Respondent:
Gregory Hancock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Powell v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv00893
Plaintiff:
Mark Powell
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Warden Hancock, Major Minchue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv00897
Plaintiff:
LaAnthony Jones
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Warden Hancock, Major Minchue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alicea et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02482
Plaintiff:
Israel Alicea, Leroy Ahnee, Richard Cabbil and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Oliver v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv00894
Plaintiff:
Willie Oliver
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Warden Hancock, Major Minchue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeWeese v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv00885
Plaintiff:
Chris DeWeese
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Warden Hancock, Major Minchue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson et al v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv00869
Plaintiff:
David Wilson, Chris DeWeese, Demeyon Watie and others
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Warden Hancock, Major Minchue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv00890
Plaintiff:
Thomas May
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Warden Hancock, Major Minchue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv00892
Plaintiff:
Adrian Shaw
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Warden Hancock, Major Minchue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baisden v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv00896
Plaintiff:
Quincy Baisden
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Warden Hancock, Major Minchue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
