Cases 21 - 30 of 192
Raphael Mendez v. Warden Steven Kallis, et al
as 21-2667
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Raphael Mendez
Defendant / Appellee:
Warden Steve Kallis, Trust Funds Commissary Sales, Mr. Woltman and others
Gordon v. Doe et al
as 4:2021cv00251
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Gordon
Defendant:
Doe, Thompson, Beth Skinner and others
Interested Party:
William A. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raphael Mendez v. Warden Steve Kallis, et al
as 21-2239
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Ms. Balas, Unit Team 2; et al., Health Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Raphael Mendez
Cabrera Mendez v. Echeverria et al
as 4:2021cv00142
Defendant:
Darling Ingredients, Inc, Eddy Echeverria, Dar Pro Solutions and others
Plaintiff:
Luis F. Cabrera Mendez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mendez v. Kallis et al
as 0:2021cv01147
Defendant:
Mr. Woltman, Ms. Hodge, Trust Funds Commissary Sales and others
Plaintiff:
Raphael Mendez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rios-Gutierrez et al v. Briggs Traditional Turf Farm, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00374
Plaintiff:
Francisco Javier Martinez-Mendez, Jonathan Rodriguez-Anaya, Jose Roberto Rios-Gutierrez and others
Defendant:
Briggs Traditional Turf Farm, Inc., Felix Rodriguez, L.C. Briggs Turf Farm, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00061
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Raphael Mendez v. Warden S. Kallis, et al
as 21-1484
Petitioner / Appellant:
Raphael Mendez
Respondent / Appellee:
Warden Steve Kallis and Unit Team 2
Mendez v. Kallis et al
as 0:2021cv00178
Defendant:
Health Services, Unkowns, Ms. Balas and others
Plaintiff:
Raphael Mendez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendez v. FMC Rochester, Minnesota et al
as 0:2020cv01979
Defendant:
FMC Rochester, Minnesota, Warden Steve Kallis, A female Correctional SiS employ and others
Plaintiff:
Raphael Mendez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
