Cases 31 - 40 of 397
Brown Munsick v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 0:2023cv02709
Plaintiff:
Lisa Brown Munsick
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Rabon v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
as 0:2023cv02697
Plaintiff:
Lisa Rabon
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Allen et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02634
Plaintiff:
Zackerie Allen, Nicholas Amatuzzo, Edwin Among and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Sameru v. Stenseth
as 0:2023cv02645
Petitioner:
Teshome Sok Sameru
Respondent:
Lisa Stenseth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mondor v. Schnell et al
as 0:2023cv02511
Plaintiff:
David Mondor
Defendant:
Paul Schnell, Michelle Smith, Guy Bosch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv02499
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv02401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Lane v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, The
as 0:2023cv02276
Plaintiff:
Lisa Lane
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Hines v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv02251
Plaintiff:
Frederick Dewayne Hines
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Adams, Evitch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michon v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
as 0:2023cv02164
Plaintiff:
Lisa Michon
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
