Cases 41 - 50 of 2,446
Smith v. Quiktrip Corporation et al
as 4:2023cv01325
Plaintiff:
Brianna Smith
Defendant:
Quiktrip Corporation, Quiktrip Corporation doing business as QuikTrip and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smith v. Wesley et al
as 4:2023cv01282
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Earl Smith, Sr.
Defendant:
Aaron J. Wesley and Sassy Trucking, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smith v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv05078
Plaintiff:
Donald Smith
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Smith v. Knightbrook Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv04180
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith
Defendant:
Knightbrook Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Smith v. USA
as 2:2023cv04173
Petitioner:
Tremaine Cordell Smith
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jones v. Mississippi County, Missouri et al
as 1:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
Almashia L Jones
Defendant:
Mississippi County, Missouri, Sheriff Britton Ferrell, Michael Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harmon v. Downing et al
as 4:2023cv01105
Plaintiff:
Howard E. Harmon
Defendant:
Alexander L. Downing, Unknown Wells, Unknown Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jennewein et al v. United Specialty Contractors, LLC
as 4:2023cv01057
Plaintiff:
Brian Jennewein, Mark Savage, John Walker Jr. and others
Defendant:
United Specialty Contractors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv06103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Smith v. Brewer
as 4:2023cv01047
Petitioner:
Charles Smith
Respondent:
Chris Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
