Cases 51 - 60 of 3,272
Williams-Bracyadams v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv03076
Plaintiff:
Nicolean Elisa Williams-Bracyadams
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Caldwell v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv03077
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Anthony Christopher Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Holmes v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv03056
Plaintiff:
Cody Valentino Holmes
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ventura v. O'Malley et al
as 4:2024cv04141
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Anthony James Ventura
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Whitfield v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv03047
Defendant:
SSA - General Counsel and Martin J. O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Bobby Shane Whitfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Miller v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv01049
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Kevin P. Miller
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Botros v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv03032
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Dalia Michael Botros
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dicke v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv03030
Plaintiff:
Allan Joe Dicke
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Myers v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv01044
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Dana Renae Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Steele v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv03220
Plaintiff:
David A. Steele
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
